"Lady Poverty" – More Rohr

“Lady Poverty”

In 313 Constantine made Christianity the established religion. He tried to do Roman civilization a favor. But today we’re not sure he did us a favor at all. Because for seventeen hundred years Christianity has largely looked at history and at itself not from the bottom but from the top, from the position of the privileged rather than the oppressed. At times we’ve moved toward the poor. Look at all of our founders, foundresses and saints:
It’s hard to find one who didn’t disestablish himself or herself and move toward the poor. And yet the Church, by and large, canonized these people after their deaths, idealizing the good things they had done but retaining its position of establishment, its position of looking at history and judging history from a position of power and wealth. This doesn’t mean the Spirit was not in the Church, but a great gift was lost to the Church, a great freedom, a great insight. The love of poverty is one of the deepest and most profound blessings of the gospel. Francis saw it. He was able to call that scary thing, poverty, a lady. Until we can call her a lady, I don ’t think we’ve made the discovery so apparent to those at the bottom and those on the edges. All things considered, poverty has a better chance of getting at the truth. The poor woman, the poor man, has nothing to protect.
The richer we are, the more we have to protect and the less free we are to hear anything new or really to understand the old. How much do I have to protect? How much public image, self-image, possessions, security, comforts, future? These tell me how rich and how poor I am.

from Embracing Christ As Francis Did: In the Church of the Poor

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “"Lady Poverty" – More Rohr

  1. It’s so true about the “protection” factor. The more we have the more we have to protect, insure, repair, upgrade, worry about etc. To hold things loosely enables us to live a life of reckless freedom and risk! I want more of this!!!

  2. “The poor woman, the poor man, has nothing to protect.”
    Beside their family I guess and their community and their hope in a better day.
    “All things considered, poverty has a better chance of getting at the truth.”
    I like this one. I just am not that keen to experience it’s full impact in my life in a material sense. Sure I would learn a great deal about what I really believe about God and his goodness and about how deep my relationships go but it would suck. I love my options, I love the fact that I can feed my family and I love the fact that I come from a country that assures all of this. I am not ready to call Poverty a Lady because I love my comforts of “the rich man” too much. But then the Master did say…”Blessed are the poor for theirs is the Kingdom.” and numerous other things that antagonist my health and wealth gospel upbringing in the church and at home.

  3. tried preaching on the sheep and the goats toa middle aged white congregation in a poor area. Got some feedback… not really that positive. I’m not the one who said we have to look after the least?!!? Those who love the poor love the challenge to give up more for the sake of others??? i’m trying ot inspire others, yet those already there, are going deeper! maybe it is just a white thing?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s